The table chart shows the information about King college in the year 1997 to 2005 in UK

Essay topics:

The table chart shows the information about King college in the year 1997 to 2005 in UK.

The tabular chart illustrates the information about, the king's college in United Kingdom, in the year: 1997 till 2005. This is clear and cohrent representation.

As far as, it is observed from the chart, in 1997, 15.4% of total students were attending the lectures, while this proportion had declined by 1.2 % in next 2 years. However, just 17.4% and 18.4% of pupils used to present in lecture, in the year 2001 and 2003 respectively. Finally, in last year, just below the one-fifth of students had been attended lectures.

Probing ahead, students in lecture based subject in 2002 were 41.4% collectively. In which, 13.4% studied mathamatics, and just above the one-tenth of total student learnt physics in lectures. However, chemistry lectures had contained only 16.4% of pupils. On the other hand, in practice based subjects, students of art and geography subjects were relatively same. Whereas, nearly 13% of pupils were present in history class.

Overall, it is observed that, peoples in lectures rose instantly throughout the given span of time. However, majority of students contained by chemistry classes, and least by Physics in lecture best classes. In addition, art and geography lecture had same number of students, while history student inclined by 1%.

Votes
Average: 6.4 (7 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-09-07 Jagroop Brar 64 view
Essays by user Jagroop Brar :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kings'' or 'king's'?
Suggestion: kings'; king's
... illustrates the information about, the kings college in United Kingdom, in the year:...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eography subjects were relatively same. Whereas, nearly 13% of pupils were present in h...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, whereas, while, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30198019802 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71690842686 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618811881188 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7074493079 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3846153846 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5384615385 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135257310707 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051885413093 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133591315994 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12830466497 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.173717332164 0.0819641961636 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.