The table data shows the proportion of iThe table data shows the proportion of income adults and children spent on 4 common items in the United Kingdom in 2005.ncome adults and children spent on 4 common items in the United Kingdom in 2005.
The table compares the percentage of expenditure for 4 conventional items from income of adults and childrens in UK in 2005
Overall, while food was mostly bought by adults, children spent a majority of their income on music. Also, adults spent less of their whole income on the four items, compared to children
Food was purchased the most by adults, which accounted for a quarter of their income, as opposed to videos (1%). In terms of music, children spent most of their money on this item with 39%, whereas the same figure for adults was much lower, at 5%
Food accounted for the lowest of their expenses (10%) which was half as much as the figure for electronic equipment (23%). Nevertheless, this item was reported with the biggest disparity berween boys and girls where boys used 18% of their income in contrast to girls who used only 5%. Finally, the same figure for men and women was relatively lower (10% and 1% respectively)
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 51
- Some people think children have the freedom to make mistakes while other people believe that adults should prevent children from making mistakes Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- Some people say free time activities for children should be organized by parents Others say that children should be free to choose what they do in their free time 73
- Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and on public transport To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, nevertheless, so, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 772.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73619631902 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42148723651 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564417177914 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.5277324427 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.4 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.2 5.23603664747 290% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169461495313 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101504869283 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915054835094 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14501933398 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931207893568 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.