The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares the information about the proportion of fast food eaten by people in Melbourne in terms of five food categories namely hamburgers, fried chicken, chicken, fried rice and noodles between 2005 and 2025.
It is noticeable that the consumption of convenience food had a slight increase in a period of 20 years. Also, the amount of hamburgers and chicken consumed were significantly higher than the remaining kinds of food.
Of the five types of food listed, hamburger had the highest consumption, at 40 units in 2005 while the proportion of fried chicken eaten in Melbourne was 5 units lower, at 35%. The fried rice and noodle consumed in that year shared the same amount, about 6 units whereas the equivalent figure for salads was only 5 units.
Despite having a small decrease at the present, the hamburgers consumed by Melbourne people is expected to increase, reaching its peak at 51 units in 2025. Meanwhile, about 37 units of fried chicken are being consumed at the moment and the proportion is thought to experienced a small growth to 45 units which is lower than that of hamburger roughly 5 units. The amount of salads consumed, interestingly, rises exponentially and is predicted to reach 41 units in 2025. However, the fried rice and noodles are forecasted to remain nearly unchanged around 9 units in the period shown.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-10 | phoaiphuthinh | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | arjnaga | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | ravitejacts | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | Võ Ngọc Trang Thanh | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-19 | vijayvj1 | 56 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 61
- Many people now undertake extreme activities from hang gliding to mountain climbing Why do people risk their lives in this way and do you think this is a good trend Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 88
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98237885463 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77515557802 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515418502203 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6296127486 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.666666667 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0990034443117 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481885584667 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382446834189 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771531740943 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346705477024 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.