The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne.
The table shows the five major types of fast food (Hamburger, Fried Chicken, Salad, Fried Rice, and Noodles) that were consumed in Melbourne in 2005, Present and 2025.
Overall, majority of the people in Melbourne consistently consumed large units of Hamburger in 2005 to present and by 2025 as well, compared to the units consumed in Noodles. The table shows that by the year of 2025 the consumption of Fried Chicken and Salad increased.
In terms of fast food eaten in Melbourne, the least consumed were Fried Rice and Noodles with 6 units consumed from 2005, difference of 1 in present (9 and 8 respectively), and 9 units in 2025. There is high units of Salad estimated in the year 2025, from 5 units in 2005 and 15 in present.
In the other hand, there is a rise in units for Fried chicken from 2005 (35), present(37) to 2025(45) that were comparable to the consumption of Hamburger which is 40 units eaten in 2005, 39 units Present and 51 units were predicted in 2025.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64367816092 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50678165926 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454022988506 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.4229334948 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.666666667 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126298104086 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859314314423 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785861790998 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100948156742 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635991387541 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.