The table provides data on how people in five countries spent their money in the year of 2002.
The table provides data on how people in five countries spent their money in the year of 2002.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is apparent that essential expenitiries such as food, drinks and tabacco comprised the major percentage for each of five countries, while leisure and education occupied the smallest part of spending.
As for details, in terms of Food/Drinks/Tobacco spending, there were 2 outliers with the highest percentage of those spending, at 32.14 and 28.91, respectively. Other countries were lagged far behind in the following line: Spain, Italy and Sweden, at 18.8, 16.36 and 15.77 proportion respectively. Clothing and footwear revealed the reverse pattern with a strong leader of Italy, where spending on fashion stood at 9 percent. It is also noticable that Ireland, Spain and Turkey was almost even with, at approximatelly 6.5 percent. Sweden demostrsted the smallest percentage on those category of expenditure reaching merely 5.5 percent.
The rest of the spendinig was divided among leisure and education. The amoun of money allocated in Turkey was 4.35 percent, while the remaining countries did not reach mere 4 percent.
- The table gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002
- The diagram shows how orange juice is made 78
- The table gives information about the land covered by forests in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with a forecast for 2015 78
- he Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools Do you agree or disagree with this prediction 73
- It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Do you agree or disagree 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 578, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this category' or 'those categories'?
Suggestion: this category; those categories
... demostrsted the smallest percentage on those category of expenditure reaching merely 5.5 perc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, so, while, as for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39010989011 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97904061894 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.67032967033 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7879376668 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223521483692 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126998645528 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.309680771353 0.0843802449381 367% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276455463516 0.15604864568 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.418101555831 0.0819641961636 510% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.