the table show information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
The given table chart illustrates the vast discrepancy between the number of means travelling in England over the 15 year period, 1985 and 2000.
Overall, it is remarkable that the number pf average distance transport by cur accounted for the highest of modes of travel in comparison with the others. Besides, there was substantial modification in most of them over the given period.
Initially, the total of average distance travelled by all modes in 2000 was 6,475, which was higher than that of 1985 occupying 4740. Whereas, the figure of travelled by walking considerably decreased from 255 in 1985 to 237 in 2000. With regard to bicycle, the figure, which was from 51 to 41, followed the same trend as that of walking.
By contrast, not only did the number of average distance transited by cur constitute 4, 8906 , but it also was the highest comparing to the others. Meanwhile, the figure of taxi stood at 13 being twice lower than that of 2000 (42). The year 2000 witnessed a dramatic increase in the number of distance commuted by long distunce bus, train, and taxi and other.
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences through out the day in 1992. 61
- the charts below show information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years. 73
- the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000. 56
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.Summarise the infomation by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The chart below show the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...igher than that of 1985 occupying 4740. Whereas, the figure of travelled by walking con...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ance transited by cur constitute 4, 8906 , but it also was the highest comparing t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, whereas, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8128342246 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58447150947 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582887700535 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.5246216854 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215276224365 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866667966702 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925347031525 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140667577248 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095488941604 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.