The table shows the amount of waste produced by different countries in 1980, 1990, 2000.
The figure presents information about the annual waste production of six different countries in the years 1980, 1990 and 2000.
The United States produced the largest amount of waste in all three years, which is significantly larger than the sum of the other five countries. In 1980, there are 2003 million tonnes of waste generated in the US and the number doubled from this year to 2000, reaching 4005 million tonnes. Japan also saw a rising trend during this period, increasing steadily from 44 to 52 million tonnes. The amount of waste production of Korea in 1980 was unknown, but it reduced almost one half from 1990 to 2000, from 31 to 19 million tonnes.
The waste produced in the remaining three countries was less significant, with the largest one being Portugal, experiencing some fluctuations and producing 9.9, 10.1, and 9.7 million tonnes in the three years respectively. A steady growth of waste production was seen in Poland, rising from 2 to 5 million tonnes during the 20 years. Ireland produced the least waste throughout this period, being 0.2 and 3 million tonnes in 1980 and 2000 respectively, with no figure provided for the year 1990.
Overall, the largest amount of waste was produced in the USA and the figure was constantly increasing. Portugal and Korean were the only two countries that showed an overall declining pattern and Ireland was the cleanest country among the six.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-29 | J a Hermione | 73 | view |
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- The chart shows how urban refuse is assorted for recycling. 84
- The president of Grove College has recommended that the college abandon its century-old tradition of all-female education and begin admitting men. Pointing to other all-female colleges that experienced an increase in applications after adopting coeducatio 55
- Some people believe that children can learn effectively by watching TV and they should be encouraged to watch TV both at home and at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The chart below contains information provided by Australia s tertiary institutions about the percentage of male and female students who enrolled in different subjects in 1995 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1185.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02118644068 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57671717817 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542372881356 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8053250243 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.7 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360980663599 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14995310388 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907005279947 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239989029511 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060708407609 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.