The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
The table provides information about how many hectars of forested area were available in various regions in the world. Overall, it is readilly apparent that South Africa were loosing the highest number of vegetation area in the world.
In the innitial year, forested are in Europe was 989 million hectares, increasing by 10 million hectares in 2000, and in the final reported year, Europe was a place where the biggest vegetation area could be found (1001 million hectars). South America was second where trees were grown in 946 million hectares of land. This region, however, lost 64 million hectars of forested land in the following periods. Africa and North America were innitially had almost similar number of vegetation land (749 and 708 million hectares, respectively). While Africa lost 40 million hectars of vegetation arean In the next decade, North America's vegetation area was only wiped out for about 3 million hectares. Then, the number of vegetation area in North America remained stable, while, Africa lost 10 million hectars of its forested land in the final year.
Asia had also a significan number of forest area in 2000 (576 million hectars), decreasing by about 6 million of heactars in the next given, and in 2005, the vegetation area could only be found in 584 million hectars of land. Additionally, Oceania was originally had the smallest number of vegetation area compared to other regions and this unchanged throghout the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-07-08 | hien3112 | 75 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | nguyenanhquan | 11 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | nguyenanhquan | 11 | view |
- The bar chart illustrates the number of people in the UK eating more than 5 portions of vegetables and fish per day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some claim that men are naturally more competitive than women To what extent do you agree or disagree 77
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other type of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 77
- the charts give information about two genres of TV programes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia 67
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: LOOSING_EFFORTRECORDSEASON[1]
Message: Did you mean 'losing the'?
Suggestion: losing the
...eadilly apparent that South Africa were loosing the highest number of vegetation area in th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09663865546 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54000197948 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491596638655 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 375.3 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.63342472 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.3 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285695227928 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14484233184 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760762524777 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195103821092 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426188363311 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.