The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates forested land area in the unit of millions of hectares across different parts of the globe. Overall, it is clear Europe holds top position for the forest land since 1990, 2000 and 2005. Whereas, Oceana taking bottom of the list over this period of time.

During the period of 1990 to 2005 there has been a slight increase in the forested area for Europe and Asia, although it is not very significant change. For Europe from 989 to 1001 and Asia 576 to 584.Oceana is almost unaffected during this time period with only drop of 2 hectares from 199 to 197.

On the other hand between 1990 and 2005 Africa, North America, South America has seen a decline in the forested area. Of which, South America and Africa being more responsible for deforestation due to which the record shows a drop of between 50-60 hectares each. While 4 hectare drop for North America in the span of 15 years.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... forest land since 1990, 2000 and 2005. Whereas, Oceana taking bottom of the list over ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ana taking bottom of the list over this period of time. During the period of 1990 to 2005 t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n a slight increase in the forested area for Europe and Asia, although it is not ...
^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Oceana
...pe from 989 to 1001 and Asia 576 to 584.Oceana is almost unaffected during this time p...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'drop' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'drops'.
Suggestion: drops
...en 50-60 hectares each. While 4 hectare drop for North America in the span of 15 yea...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 748.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61728395062 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27947509447 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617283950617 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8002953493 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135153211334 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692572546285 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920421161278 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996023620248 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075673220229 0.0819641961636 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.