Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Skilled workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a huge contribution to society and considering this reason they should be paid higher compared to sports and entertainment people. In my opinion, the social contribution of this sector is more than any other professions, so they need to be awarded extra.

Firstly, being in one of these professions means a huge responsibility on the shoulders. A persons life depends on it, if you take the example of hospitals they are a life line for the human race and their well-being. They work round the clock, and room for mistake should be near zero. Moreover, if you consider the schools, they are the first stepping stone of our lives. Whatever we learn or perform in future we own to our teachers. I still remember the teachers of my school dedicating endless efforts for us to do better in the exam, while any vital issues related to health hugely depends on the doctors behavior and knowledge. Both of these have a striking similarity in terms of responsibility.

On the Contrary, peoples involved in gaming events and films/television are associated more to built an image for self. For example, they are not concerned about someone else's life as much as the doctors, nurses and teachers do. Reason being, its not their field of expertise and so for this reason it isn't of a very critical importance to them till an extent. There is always another change for them while this is not the case with the professionals of medical and education field.

In conclusion, I am in strong favor that the skilled workers of hospitals and schools receive a higher pay than the sports and entertainment individuals. Argument is fairly clear for this favor, responsibility and results.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professions'' or 'profession's'?
Suggestion: professions'; profession's
...xtra. Firstly, being in one of these professions means a huge responsibility on the shou...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...huge responsibility on the shoulders. A persons life depends on it, if you take the exa...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 604, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...related to health hugely depends on the doctors behavior and knowledge. Both of these h...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
..., nurses and teachers do. Reason being, its not their field of expertise and so for...
^^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... of expertise and so for this reason it isnt of a very critical importance to them t...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, still, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91126279863 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86146080283 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587030716724 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5276311779 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249048385944 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716801243495 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947963051769 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156765254827 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121593339208 0.056905535591 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.