The table illustrates information about the number of people, who used two different gadgets in Luxemburg, Italy, Singapore, Germany, South Korea, and China in 2003.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that Luxembourg was the most successful country, using both phones and computers; however, China was in the lowest category throughout the period.
In detail, 872 thousand and 900 thousand of the total number of Luxembourgish citizens who used mobiles and computers had the highest number of users compared to other figures, followed by Italians with 737T, who were engaged in phones, but just half of them used computers.
Moreover, there was around a 1 per cent difference in phone users between Singaporeans and Germans, since Germans and South Koreans had nearly 2 per cent differences in the number of phone holders. Still, the figure for personal computers was equal at 452T respectively. China had the least number of people using both gadgets over the year.
- The plans below show the layout of the university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people believe that in order to be effective political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently c 50
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20512820513 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68144941033 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.3621437147 43.030603864 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.333333333 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185053421533 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883858512011 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045006788686 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103302123768 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612961882638 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.