The table illustrates information about the number of people, who used two different gadgets in Luxemburg, Italy, Singapore, Germany, South Korea, and China in 2003.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that Luxembourg was the most successful country, using both phones and computers; however, China was in the lowest category throughout the period.
In detail, 872 thousand and 900 thousand of the total number of Luxembourgish citizens who used mobiles and computers had the highest number of users compared to other figures, followed by Italians with 737T, who were engaged in phones, but just half of them used computers.
Moreover, there was around a 1 per cent difference in phone users between Singaporeans and Germans, since Germans and South Koreans had nearly 2 per cent differences in the number of phone holders. Still, the figure for personal computers was equal at 452T respectively. China had the least number of people using both gadgets over the year.
- Many governments think that economic progress is most important goal some people however think that other types of progress and equally important for a country 61
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage of our natural environment What are the causes and solutions 78
- In the past most people worked for small businesses while more people now work for large businesses What are the advantages and disadvantages of people working for large businesses 67
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this massage 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20512820513 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68144941033 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.3621437147 43.030603864 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.333333333 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185053421533 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883858512011 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045006788686 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103302123768 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612961882638 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.