The table illustrates how many mobile phones were sold of five branches from 2006 to 2012, unit in million.
Overall, it can be seen that Samsung and Apple were the favourite branches of people during 6 years.
The noticeable features is that Nokia had the highest market in 2006, with 345 million. Mobile phones were sold by this branch, which reached a peak at 475 million in 2008. However, there was a gently decrease in numbers of buyers, ending with 335 million in 2012/
Regards to Samsung, the numbers of these devices went up gradually during the given period and had a peak at 396.5 million in 2012. Besides, Apple had a similar trend, with 135.8 million devices were sold in 2012.
Another important point is that Ericsson and Motorola had together downward trend, beginning with 74 million and 210 million respectively in 2006, ending with 28 million were sold in 2012.
- Cement and concrete production 56
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- Cement and concrete production 56
- To what extent has the internet made life more convenient?Give reasons for your answer and give any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 78
- In many countries, schools have severe problems with student behaviour. What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ive branches from 2006 to 2012, unit in million. Overall, it can be seen that Samsung ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gently') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...475 million in 2008. However, there was a gently decrease in numbers of buyers, ending with 335 m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 735.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83552631579 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29263808841 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598684210526 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 203.4 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1543766317 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171034476968 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908201004623 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464942223214 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104855797052 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455186477266 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.