The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009.
The given tabular chart reveals the information about the four different secondary schools attended by the learners from the year 2000 to 2009. The data is calibrated in per centum.
It can be seen that, In the year of 2000 voluntary controlled schools were attended by 52℅ of the students. However, the per centum of pupils who had attended this school in the next nine years had been decreased. Meanwhile, 12℅ learners went to community schools and 24℅ learners had gone to Grammer schools. In addition to this, attendance of specialists schools in the years: 2000, 2005 and 2009 was 12℅, 11℅ and 10℅ respectively.
As far as trend was concerned, in grammar schools the dramatic fall had been observed in the per centum of learners from the year 2000 to 2009. Along with this, every year only one per centum reduction was observed in specialists schools for pupils attendance since the year 2000. Surprisingly, in the year of 2005 and 2009 per centum of students who had gone to community schools were 32℅ and 58℅ respectively.
Overall, it is evident that the community schools were least attended by the students in starting year, but in the last year of given period these schools were attended by maximum pupils.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | Đa Thiện | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Lia Bui | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | Jotdeep | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | harshiniharshini | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | anmol khipal | 73 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- One should have enough money to fulfill our basic needs and rest of the should be given to needy people. To what extent do u agree or disagree. 73
- The two pie charts show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 67
- The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95215311005 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57489184102 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492822966507 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0237761445 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25560259094 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12230214167 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727602418759 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18530145167 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462376545521 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.