The diagram below show how glass containers, such as bottles, are produced and recycled.
The first flow diagram highlights the process of manufacturing glass containers, and the second flow diagram depicts the steps in which used glass can be recycled to make new items. It is a clear and coherent representation.
It can be seen that, glass can be manufactured by using three raw materials and other chemicals as well, wherein the four distinct stages are involved in the production of glass. In contrast, recycling process requires five steps to turn used glass into new products.
Firstly, in the production of glass container three raw materials: sand, soda ash, limestone and other chemicals are mixed together. Then, this mixture can be heated in a glass furnace at approximately 1500 Celsius to produce molten. The molten glass has been then shaped, by blowing, to create the end products, namely glass containers.
Likewise, to begin with recycling process collect the used glass items. After this, sort them according to the colours, and then wash these items in order to remove impurities. Subsequently, at the fourth stage of recycling, the glass is crushed and melted, and then finally resulting glass is moulded to create new products.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-25 | tieuquynh | 67 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | tieuquynh | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | jasvirkr | view | |
| 2021-05-02 | Hoàng Ngọc Anh | view | |
| 2020-12-25 | Harpreet Raizada | 89 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990. 73
- The diagram below show how glass containers such as bottles are produced and recycled 76
- The two pie charts show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 67
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, likewise, second, so, then, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18518518519 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76237097973 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597883597884 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6451638524 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175851974528 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071537373769 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547102233349 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117787336707 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418761640433 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.