The table displays the percentages of students to pupils attendance from four different types of secondary school by year 2000 to 2009.
Overall, it was clear that voluntary controlled, specialist and grammar school had the highest proportion at the beginning and slightly decrease each year.
The most sighnjficant feature, voluntary control school had the highest proportion in 2000 which carry approximately 52% . Grammar school in 2000 had lower than voluntary education about 28% which was 24% of pupils attendance. As comparation, in 2000 specialist and community education had the same amount and had the least percentages which was 12%.
Another important point, voluntary attendance had around 38% in 2005 and 20% in 2009. Specialist in 2005 and 2009 had the least percentages of attendance which 11% and 10% respectively. Grammar school had 19% and 12% in 2005 and 2009 respectively. As comparation, community school was dramatically increase in 2005 and 2009 which 32%-58%.
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009. 61
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009. 22
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...on in 2000 which carry approximately 52% . Grammar school in 2000 had lower than v...
^^
Line 7, column 299, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'increased'.
Suggestion: increased
...tion, community school was dramatically increase in 2005 and 2009 which 32%-58%.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49019607843 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0324605801 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509803921569 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.9297210632 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.11111111111 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293067512965 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143164980746 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132471725213 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218728569402 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170624203609 0.0819641961636 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.