The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009.
The table illustrates the percentage of students enroll in four different kinds of schools from 2000 to 2009.
Overall, it is clear that the proportion of students attending specialist schools, grammar schools and voluntary - controlled schools dicreased while this figure for community schools increased.
In 2000, voluntary schools headed for the proportion of students, at 52% which is higher than the percentage of pupils enrolling in grammar schools (24%). 12% of students attending in specialist schools and community schools for each.
In 2009, the percentage of pupils going to voluntary - controlled schools declined dramatically to only 20%. Grammar schools and specialist schools also saw a slight decrease, to 12% and 10% respectively. In contrast, 2009 witnessed a significant increase of the student attendance in community schools, from 12% in 2000 to 58% in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-28 | Siska Umila Adha | view | |
| 2023-07-29 | Siska Umila Adha | view | |
| 2020-11-06 | bsngocson | 72 | view |
| 2019-03-07 | Lathdavanh lily | 61 | view |
| 2018-06-19 | Rajwinder k | 56 | view |
- The chart below gives information about global sales of games software CDs and DVD or video 63
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufactures to produce vehicles at their US factories 73
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Australia between 1995 anhd 2000 63
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in three different countries 75
- The graph below shows cinema attendance by age group in Great Britain 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt increase of the student attendance in community schools, from 12% in 2000 to 5...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 745.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 134.0 196.424390244 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55970149254 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.40232815919 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0115029614 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 71.0 106.607317073 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529850746269 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 197.1 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0453229438 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.428571429 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329683550878 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172212176429 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489073537048 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22680571996 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340021188276 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.