The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009.

The assigned table chart depicts the information about the percentage of students attending four different types of school from 2000 to 2009.
From the overall analysis, it is manifest to see that, just over one half of learners prefered to study in Voluntary controlled school in 2000. However, majority of students attended community schools.
A cursory glance at the given table chart is adequate enough to see that , in 2000, only 12% of students attended specialist school.This figure decreased to 10% in 2009. As far as grammer schools were concerned, almost a quarter of pupils studied in this school but the percentage of students attending grammer schools dwindled to 12% in last year.
With regards to Voluntary schools, initiating at 52% in 2000 and declining to 38% in 2006 , the percentage of students attending this school fall to 20% in last year. Lastly, only few students were interested in attending community schools during 2000 and 2005 , but the percentage of learners studting in community schools sky rocketed to 58% in 2009.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ble chart is adequate enough to see that , in 2000, only 12% of students attended ...
^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... of students attended specialist school.This figure decreased to 10% in 2009. As far...
^^^^
Line 4, column 90, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...52% in 2000 and declining to 38% in 2006 , the percentage of students attending th...
^^
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...g community schools during 2000 and 2005 , but the percentage of learners studting...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, lastly, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14619883041 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73333720019 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549707602339 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3338112076 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.714285714 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315352322369 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159708105799 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872272026166 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216966874218 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877097279541 0.0819641961636 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.