The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009.
The table represents the changes of a number of students have attended four different schools (specialist, grammar voluntary- controlled and community schools) in a percentage from 2000 to 2009.
Overall, the proportion of pupils attending specialist, grammar and voluntary-controlled school declined, whereas the community schools experienced the growth in the percentage of students during the projected periods.
In terms of community college, which attendance rate was the lowest of 12% in 2000 but this rate increased drastically to reach at 32% in 2005 and by 2009, it recorded the highest attending rate of 58%.
In contrast, other three schools experienced a decline in its attending rates. Among all, the highest proportion was found in voluntary-controlled schools of 52% in 2000 and which fell to only 20% from 2000 to 2009. Similarly the relative number of grammar schools (of 12%) in 2000 and school children attending rates for both schools declined to 12% and 10% in 2009 respectively.
- A society develops the technology in communicating devices rapidly such as smart phones, tablets and other communicating devices. Some people claims that the disadvantages of such device outweigh the advantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010. 78
- Smoking is not only harm the smoker, but also those who nearby. Therefore, smoking should be baned in public places. To what extent do you agre or disagree? 67
- The chart below shows the amount of sales for four different kinds of foods in supermarkets in four different cities in America. 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 216, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...ich fell to only 20% from 2000 to 2009. Similarly the relative number of grammar schools ...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'similarly', 'whereas', 'in contrast']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.284916201117 0.268076937826 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.106145251397 0.116061578633 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0446927374302 0.0759168565197 59% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0223463687151 0.0366838410393 61% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0111731843575 0.0131127313244 85% => OK
Prepositions: 0.162011173184 0.155750635184 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0335195530726 0.0379272487307 88% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.27971673282 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0279329608939 0.0210936926555 132% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0949720670391 0.0948980150116 100% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0111731843575 0.00967000014798 116% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 997.0 1161.00487805 86% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.9 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.35031847134 5.90752243213 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73763899035 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.40127388535 0.337110787985 119% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.343949044586 0.247514529752 139% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.248407643312 0.171178102325 145% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.184713375796 0.112407865282 164% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27971673282 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528662420382 0.546246751206 97% => OK
Word variations: 42.5870088948 49.3433353143 86% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 8.93414634146 67% => OK
Sentence length: 26.1666666667 23.0094962315 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1183498108 42.9750493124 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.166666667 135.714022679 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 23.0094962315 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 0.689975730869 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 60.5615711253 47.7609492067 127% => OK
Elegance: 3.44 2.94281807926 117% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370517912444 0.418131533498 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.218323066651 0.181151798455 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.128477856961 0.0850326197045 151% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.836001393824 0.706616315825 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.187031619633 0.157042692854 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.226416667792 0.228904883108 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105361379734 0.108899403657 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.383730882094 0.367819155151 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0777697168876 0.0812612215331 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280025310061 0.316326947829 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621962948756 0.0921553760075 67% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70731707317 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.16585365854 126% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 7.1512195122 84% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.