The given chart illustrates the percentage of children attending four various secondary schools for a period of 9 years from 2000 to 2009. The mentioned parameters are specialist schools, grammar schools, voluntary - controlled schools and community schools.
It is clear from the data that voluntary controlled schools accommodated almost half (52%) of the students population in 2000. Whereas, the specialist schools (12%) and community schools (12%) received least number of children during the same time. Grammar schools housed almost twice as many students as compared to least populated schools, which is 24%.
A detailed view of the table shows that as years goes by every schools lost it's acceptance except community schools. In the begging it had only received 12% of total students numbers but in the end the proportion was almost six folded and claiming half of the total school goers. Among these 9 years of time specialist schools' always be the least popular one among the others. In addition, voluntary controlled schools lost its fame drastically from 52% to 20% in the end.
In conclusion, voluntary controlled schools and community schools were always prominent among students during the mentioned period and other two were the least approved secondary schools.
- Nowadays some people tend to take temporary jobs for they have the time to do other things Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 71
- Involvement of youth in crimes is increasing at an alarming rate Throw some light on the causes and possible solutions 90
- Some people think that large, impressive buildings are important for a city. Others believe that the money should be spent on improving schools and hospitals. Discuss both these views and give your own reason. 95
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in 1980 and 1990. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred. Write at least 150 words 78
- Trade and travel would be a lot easier with a single, global currency that we all use. Do you agree or disagree with this statement. Would a single currency cause any problems? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ols accommodated almost half 52% of the students population in 2000. Whereas, the specia...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'received the least'.
Suggestion: received the least
...t schools 12% and community schools 12% received least number of children during the same time...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the least'.
Suggestion: to the least
...most twice as many students as compared to least populated schools, which is 24%. A d...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...gging it had only received 12% of total students numbers but in the end the proportion w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'half' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'halves'.
Suggestion: halves
...tion was almost six folded and claiming half of the total school goers. Among these ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, whereas, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37313432836 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67676705276 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52736318408 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6694777688 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128756305207 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600981962243 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441458594751 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0897672547758 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281404298791 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.