The table shows the proportions of pupils attenting four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009.

Essay topics:

The table shows the proportions of pupils attenting four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009.

The given tabular chart highlights the information about the four different schools: Specialist, grammar, voluntary-controlled schools and Community schools, which were attended by students over the period of 2000 till 2009. The data is calibrated in per centum.

It can be seen that in the year 2000, specialist schools were attended by 12% of children whereas, grammar schools had been attended by double the number of children from specialist schools. In addition to this, there was decline in the percentage of children who took part in specialist schools by 1% in upcoming two years: 2005 and 2009. Moreover, number of students who had attended grammar school in the two years: 2005 and 2009 were 19% and 12% respectively.

Moving further, 52% of children in the year 2000 had took part in voluntary-controlled schools following with, 38% in the year 2005 and 20% in the year 2009. Apart from this, there was incline in the popularity of community schools as participation of students had been risen by 20% from 2000 to 2005 and peak value of students attended it in the year 2009 which was 58.

Overall, it is evident that in the initial years voluntary controlled market was more popular among children but in upcoming year community schools had overcome voluntary controlled market.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-06 Đa Thiện 61 view
2019-10-12 Lia Bui 73 view
2019-08-12 Jotdeep 78 view
2019-07-28 harshiniharshini 78 view
2019-07-05 anmol khipal 73 view
Essays by user Nikhil Dutt Sharma :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...r, 52% of children in the year 2000 had took part in voluntary-controlled schools fo...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, whereas, apart from, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10328638498 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9642078615 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474178403756 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1159513864 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.875 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140656238954 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722878921604 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037404634929 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927158577446 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374886755763 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.