The chart below gives information about Southland's main export in 2000, 2013 and future projections for 2025.
The given layout highlights the information about the main products had exported by Southland's in the two years: 2000 and 2013 and future projections for 2025. The given data is calibrated in billion.
It can be seen that in the year 2000, nearly 7 billion dairy products were being exported by Southland's, following with peak value of dairy exports of 9.9 million in the year 2013 and 9.3 million in the year 2025. In addition to this, heat products had the sale of 6 billion euros in the year 2000, whereas sale had dropped to 5.5 billion in the year 2013. However, main three products: International tourism, Dairy products and Meat products of the future projections for the year 2025 contribute 9.9, 9.5 and 5 million respectively.
Moving further, International tourism, in the year 2013, had the contribution of 0.8 million euros more in comparison to the year 2000. Apart from all this, international tourism contribute 9.9 million for the future projections for 2025.
Overall, it is evident that exports in international tourism rise however, exports in meat products decline.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-18 | Nikhil Dutt Sharma | 67 | view |
- The table shows the proportions of pupils attenting four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009. 67
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide ( CO2) emission per person in the united kingdom, sweaden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 67
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the united kingdom, sweaden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wher 67
- The chart gives the information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projected for 2050. 67
- The bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on 2 groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...r 2025. The given data is calibrated in billion. It can be seen that in the year 200...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, whereas, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82047189818 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488888888889 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1350180625 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290179673795 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150962357072 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148103321566 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208903578591 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125970219795 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.