The table shows social and economic indicators for four different countries in 1994. Summarise the main features.
The table shows a comparison of social and economic indicators such as annual income per person, life expectancy, daily calorie supply per person, and the adult literacy rate of four different countries in 1994.
According to the data gathered by United Nations statistics, annual income per person is highest in Japan, and second highest in Canada, both being about 10,000 US dollars. On the contrary, yearly income per person is less than 200 dollars in Peru and Zaire. Life expectancy at birth is also reduced in these countries, with 51 and 47 years, respectively in Peru and Zaire. The same is higher in Japan and Canada, around 80 years. The data indicate that Canada and Japan are the most privileged countries in numbers, while Peru and Zaire stand at the other end. Canada and Japan have an adult literacy rate of 99 %. Peru and they have a literacy rate of 68 and 34 % respectively.
The general conclusion that can be drawn from the table is that Peru and Zaire need to be improved socially and economically.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-30 | Sreeveni Das | 84 | view |
- Percentage of people using multiple social networking sites 73
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world. Why is this? What are the advantages and disadvantages of solar energy? 78
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages. If these are not taught, many are at the risk of dying out. In your opinion is it important for everyone to learn English? Should we try to to ensure the survival o 56
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1980 to 2010 in a particular country. summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, while, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81818181818 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52843942652 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607954545455 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.2563154796 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2222222222 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146882498115 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519735949559 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0979028983907 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138050180229 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126371220034 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.