The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries.
The tables compare the amount of money spent on fairtrade tea and pineapples in five different European nations in two years 2010 and 2015.
It is clear that sales of fairtrade tea increased in all five countries, while the sales figure for pineapples only rose in three out of the five nations over the period shown.
In 2010, Austria saw by far the highest sales of fairtrade tea and pineapples, at €4 million and €16 million respectively. In 2015, sales of fairtrade tea in France went up dramatically from €2.5 million to €21 million and became the highest figure compared to other countries. Meanwhile, Austria's sales figure rose more slowly, at €8 million. At the same year, the expenditure on fairtrade pineapples saw a significant rise in Austria to €48 million compared to €6.5 million in France .
In contrast, the sales of two fairtrade products were lower in Germany, Netherlands, and Norway. The money spent on fairtrade tea grew slightly in these countries to below €3 million, whereas the sales of fairtrade pineapples fell in Norway and Germany in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-23 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 61
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton 67
- The flowchart below shows the process involved in completing the work experience requirement for university students. 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 78
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 485, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...llion compared to €6.5 million in France . In contrast, the sales of two fairtrad...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05555555556 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68302447077 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538888888889 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5576963208 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363406257246 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174291408255 0.103423049105 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100918333868 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253822307668 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670646182086 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.