The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The tables illustrate the amount of Fair trade-labelled coffee and bananas sold in five nations of Europe in years 999 and 2004.

According to first table, although Switzerland had the highest coffee sale among other countries in 1999, at 3 million euros, and even doubled in 2004, UK surpassed it with experiencing a big jump in sales of this product from 1.5 million euros to 20 million euros over the 5- year period. On the other hand, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden saw a slightly increase in sales of coffee as if they combined sold less than just Switzerland in 2004.

Given to second table, the first rank in terms of bananas sales went to Switzerland for both years 1999 and 2004 at 15 million euros and 47 million euros respectively. However, it was Belgium having the most rate of increment in sales of this product from 0.6 million euros in 1999 to 4 million euros 5 years later, near seven fold. The second biggest change was related to UK from 1-5.5. In contrast, other two countries showed a different pattern. In fact, sales of bananas fell from 1.8 million euros and 2 million euros to near half in Sweden and Denmark respectively during the 5 years.

Overall, sales of coffee increased in all five countries, whereas because of decreasing in sales in Swede n and Denmark, this is not true for bananas. In addition, sales of these products were significantly higher in Switzerland and UK than in any of the other countries.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...r hand, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden saw a slightly increase in sales of coffee as if they combined ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'fold' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'folds'.
Suggestion: folds
...million euros 5 years later, near seven fold. The second biggest change was related ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, whereas, in addition, in contrast, in fact, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7619047619 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58955253141 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539682539683 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.2183344339 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.333333333 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 5.23603664747 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14696942518 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757548384363 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489922229373 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117758281956 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413481337672 0.0819641961636 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.