The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares five different countries in term of sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004. As it is observed from the given statistic, coffee sales increased in all the given nations over the last 5 years. The figure of bananas sales witnessed a similar trend in 3 countries except Sweden and Denmark, which has a slight decrease in bananas supply.
To begin, it is apparent that in the UK sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee were highest compared to the other countries, accelerating dramatically from 1.5 millions of euros in 1999 to 20 millions in the next 5 years. Besides that, the consumption of coffee in Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden both experienced a steady growth, which was 6, 2, 1.7, 1 millions of euros respectively in the year 2004.
Following that, the pattern of Fairtrade-labelled bananas sales registered trebling rise in Switzerland market, increasing from 15 millions in 1999 to 47 millions in 2004. The bananas consumption figure of two other nations UK and Belgium also underwent a considerable growth while reach the peak at 5.5 and 4 respectively in 2004. On the other hand, over the proved period, the amount of money that Sweden and Denmark gained by selling Fairtrade-labelled bananas seen a slight drop, falling from 1.8 millions to 1 millions and 2 millions to 0.9 millions respectively.
Thus, the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee experienced an upward trend in all given countries, whereas that of Fairtrade-labelled bananas in Sweden and Denmark registered a gradual reduce.
AnnaBui
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-16 | yeu192 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | thuhangdth99 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | Szprawstyle | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-21 | AnnaBui | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-06 | soxmomomo | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...tries, accelerating dramatically from 1.5 millions of euros in 1999 to 20 millions in the nex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '1 million'.
Suggestion: 1 million
...d a steady growth, which was 6, 2, 1.7, 1 millions of euros respectively in the year 2004. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, thus, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25498007968 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40542145518 2.65546596893 128% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486055776892 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.9 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.3891631396 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.555555556 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8888888889 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22238828165 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119043454735 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883402057334 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162420456956 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447778051888 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.