The tables below give information about sales of Faitrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparions where relevant
The given tables illustrate the number of profits brought from selling coffee and bananas between 1999 and 2004 in five different regions in Europe.
It is clear that the year 2004 witnessed a significant increase in the figures of coffee revenue in all European countries. Additionally, UK and Switzerland were two countries that made up the largest turnovers of coffee and bananas.
As can be seen from the tables, in 1999, the quantity of Swiss coffee earning ranked the first with 3 million euros and then it saw a double rise in 2004. Followed by Denmark which experienced a slight growth from 1,8 million euros in 1999 to 2 million euros in 2004. Similarly, the number of UK profit increased dramatically by 18,5 to 20 million euros. The amount of Belgium and Sweden coffee sold grew to 1,7 and 1 million euros respectively at the end of the period.
On the other hand, in 1999, Switzerland also accounted for the highest level of sales of bananas with 15 million euros. After that, it increased more than triple. The sales volume of bananas in UK and Belgium rose by almost five times to 5.5 and 4 correspondingly. Meanwhile, in 1999, the number of Swedish and Danish bananas selling stood at under 2 million euros. Then they decreased nearly 1 million euros in 2004
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-16 | yeu192 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | thuhangdth99 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | Szprawstyle | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-21 | AnnaBui | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-06 | soxmomomo | 56 | view |
- the line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in china between 1982 and 2006 73
- If a product is of good quality and meets people's needs, people will buy it. Advertising is unnecessary and is no more than a type of entertainment. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in china between 1982 and 2006 67
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in china between 1982 and 2006 73
- If a product is of good quality and meets people's needs, people will buy it. Advertising is unnecessary and is no more than a type of entertainment. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncrease in the figures of coffee revenue in all European countries. Additionally,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, similarly, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77927927928 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64084236044 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558558558559 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1039976742 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4166666667 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162285253652 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628165452603 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480628007271 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113946398987 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362619406147 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.