The tables below give information about the world population and distribution in 1950 and 2000, with an estimate of the situation in 2050. Summarise the information.
The first table depicts dramatic increases in the total world population from 2.5 billion in 1950 to 6.0 billion in 2000, with an expected rise by 1.5 times in the next 50 years. Besides, the second table provides the distribution of the world population in six different regions in these three years.
Overall, although the number of people in the world has been following an increased trend during this century, this trend is affecting parts of the world differently.
To be more precise, stables in the numbers of people can be seen in the Asian' figures and Latin American's patterns. From 1950 to 2000, Asia retained the most significant share of the world population (56% and 60%, alternatively), and it is predicted that in 2050, Asian will have remained the first position at around 60%. Similarly, increasing from 6% in 1950 to 9% in 2000, Latin America is estimated to stay at the same level in the next 50 years.
As far as other regions are concerned, while the patterns of Africa present an increased trend, different pictures appear in those of more industrialized parts, Europe and North America. In 1950, there was only 9% population of the world living in Africa, and this number increased rapidly by 13% after the first haft of the century. Africa is expected to grow faster as it will be a home for a one-fifth population in the world in 2050. Meanwhile, a considerable fall can be seen in two other regions, from almost a quarter in 1950 in Europe to only 12% by 2000 and from 7% to only 5% in North America. This decline is predicted to continue a mere 11% of the total in both two parts together by 2050. Strikingly, only in Oceania did the population be rare, and it will continue keeping until 2050.
- The money spent on research has brought enormous benefits to mankind, but it could be more usefully applied. How far do you agree? 78
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts figures 2025.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 84
- All children should study a foreign language, starting in the earliest grades. To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement ? 73
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree with these views? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 369, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...tury. Africa is expected to grow faster as it will be a home for a one-fifth popul...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, second, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 965.302439024 148% => OK
No of words: 305.0 196.424390244 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66885245902 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.609650706 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 106.607317073 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501639344262 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6053795873 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.666666667 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4166666667 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242114702658 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091978998969 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581142253814 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152715975741 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651718582808 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.