task 1: expenditure on income groups
The bar chart compares expenditure on Hamburger, Fish & Chips and pizza by three different income groups in Britain in the year 1990.
Overall, It is clear from the bar chart that the expenditure on Hamburger by high income group was highest while the number for low income was Fish & Chips. Additionally, there was a significant difference in the figure for Hamburger and Fish & Chips by average income group in 1990.
The expenditure for Hamburger by high income group stood at about 42, which was the highest number of the whole chart, whereas only over 15 for Fish & Chips and under 20 for Pizza. At the same time, the number for average income group was lower at above 30, exactly 20, respectively. However, the expenditure on Hamburger by low income group made up with only nearly 15.
By contrast, only over 5 spent on pizza in the figure for low income group. There was about 16 in the number for Fish & Chips. This was followed by average income group at above 10.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-06 | hoangquang | 67 | view |
- task 1: the birth rate 78
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- task 2: Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 81
- task 1: the consumer price index 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...iture on Hamburger by high income group was highest while the number for low income was Fis...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w income was Fish & Chips. Additionally, there was a significant difference in th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71929824561 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44710968616 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473684210526 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6275862689 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6666666667 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333475225831 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190455986383 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838903995755 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256710108048 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264665931595 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.33 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.