three major problems in London during 3 years.
The line chart illustrates the proportion of the 3 most outstanding problems: litter, air quality and noise in London in the period of 3 years.
At the first glance, we can figure out that litter occupies the majority, whereas noise is considered as the least worried pollution.
It is obvious that during 3 years, litter takes over the highest rank with around 70% of the first year. The chart indicates the surge of litter among year 1 and year 2, nearly 6% in total. Since then, the percentage of littler tends to drop gradually in year 3, from 76% to 68%. Unlike litter, air quality shows a reduction in year 2 and a slightly raise in year 3.
There is dramatic gap in comparison with noise pollution and the others, 58% in the first year and the number keeps falling considerably until year 3, at around 52%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-12 | reverjae | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | Phuong1810 | 11 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-11 | Lananhtranhanoi | 67 | view |
- The best way to resolve the world environmetal problems is to increase the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree ? 89
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graph below.» Write at least 150 words. 78
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20% in the last 10 years.Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend 67
- Some people think a job not only provides income but also a social life. Others think it is better to develop social life with people you do not work with. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 67
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('raise') instead of another adjective.
...quality shows a reduction in year 2 and a slightly raise in year 3. There is dramatic gap in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly raise in year 3. There is dramatic gap in comparison with noise pollution a...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsiderably until year 3, at around 52%
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 681.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63265306122 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46710976055 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 191.7 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7774054872 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2857142857 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0689211149815 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365496809547 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578062793822 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0441420635214 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513428593448 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.