The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The given pie charts displayed the changing pattern of annual spending in five different aspects by a specific school in the United Kingdom in the years of 1981, 1991, and 2001 .
A glance at the graphs reveals that the percentage of money which was spent annually on resources or teachers’ salaries categories experienced an increase then decrease in 1991 and 2001, respectively. The school spent more money on the insurance, whilst it spent less money on the other works categories.
The percentage of money which was spent on teachers’ salaries experienced a noticeable increase from 40% in 1981 to 50% in 2001. Subsequent to that, this figure experienced a mild decline to 45% in 2001; however, it remained the largest part of each chart. Similar to that, there was a 5% increase in the funding percentagewise of the resource’s category accounting for 20% in 1991, in contrast to 15% in 1981. On the contrary, this percentage was collapsed to 9% in 2001.
Turning to the remaining data sets, it is clearly obvious that 23% of the annual spending gone to the furniture and equipment category in 2001, relative to 5% and 15% in 1991 and 1981, respectively. Besides that, the school spent 2%, 3%, and 8% of its fund on the insurance category in 1981, 1991, and 2001,respectively. Conversely, 15% of the money was spent on the other works category in 2001, in comparison to 22% and 28% in 1991 and 1981, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 67
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Nowadays museums and historical sites are mainly visited by foreign tourists instead of locals. Why is this happening? What can be done to get locals to visit museums and historical sites more? 56
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the changing pattern of annual spending in five different aspects by a specific ...
^^
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...dom in the years of 1981, 1991, and 2001 . A glance at the graphs reveals tha...
^^
Line 9, column 135, Rule ID: SUBSEQUENT_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'after'
Suggestion: After
...crease from 40% in 1981 to 50% in 2001. Subsequent to that, this figure experienced a mild de...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 374, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'works'' or 'work's'?
Suggestion: works'; work's
...15% of the money was spent on the other works category in 2001, in comparison to 22% ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, conversely, however, if, so, then, in contrast, in contrast to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9670781893 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06972411258 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493827160494 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9462751624 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.7 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276185955581 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127689819666 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0983834724243 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205147296817 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116561195209 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.