The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The pie charts compare and contrast data on the changes in the finance expenditure of the school in the United Kingdom over 20-year period starting 1981.
Overall, the percent of spending on the teacher's salaries ranked first during the whole period of time, while that for insurance stood last. Insurance costs experienced growth, while support staff salaries showed a decrease.
In the 1981, the higest share of expenditures took tutor's salaries, which totaled 40 % of all costs. In 10 years it slightly increased by 10 % and made up 50 % in 1991, further declined until 45 % in 2001. Support employees salaries decreased sagnificantly from 28 % in 1981 to 15% in the end of the period. In sharp contrast to this, the incurace costs had the lowest percent of school spending and ammounted only 2 % in the begining of the period. However, by the end of the period it dramatically grew in 4 times and equalled 8%.
Spending on differenet resources and school furniture was the same and equaled 15 % in 1981. But if resource costs rose gradually in 1991 and totaled 20%, the last then dropped sharply in 3 times. Over the next 10 years, the school increased greatly spending on the furniture and equipment until 23%, and finance spent on the resources reduced dramatically approximately in 2 times, that totaled 9 % in 2001.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in the finance expenditure of the school in the United Kingdom over 20year period...
^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... salaries ranked first during the whole period of time while that for insurance stood last Ins...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es took tutors salaries which totaled 40 of all costs In 10 years it slightly inc...
^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In 10 years it slightly increased by 10 and made up 50 in 1991 further declined...
^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...slightly increased by 10 and made up 50 in 1991 further declined until 45 in 20...
^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...up 50 in 1991 further declined until 45 in 2001 Support employees salaries decre...
^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...salaries decreased sagnificantly from 28 in 1981 to 15 in the end of the period I...
^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of school spending and ammounted only 2 in the begining of the period However by...
^^
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ol furniture was the same and equaled 15 in 1981 But if resource costs rose gradu...
^^
Line 7, column 389, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... approximately in 2 times that totaled 9 in 2001
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78923766816 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65869746367 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52466367713 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 223.0 22.4926829268 991% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1068.0 112.824112599 947% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 223.0 22.9334400587 972% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 40.0 5.23603664747 764% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201818216889 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.201818216889 0.103423049105 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125624003786 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552923682221 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 112.6 13.2329268293 851% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -137.95 61.2550243902 -225% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 87.9 10.3012195122 853% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.98 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 18.38 8.06136585366 228% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 11.4329268293 481% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 91.2 10.9970731707 829% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 88.0 11.0658536585 795% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.