The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001.
The pie graphs compare the difference of financial invests in some areas of a British school in 1981,1991 and 2001. It is clear that the money paid for teacher’s salaries ranked first in these three years, which were about 50% of the total spending.
In the year of 1991, it saw a slight decrease in expenditure of furniture and equipment from 15% in 1981 to 5%, which followed by an increase of 18% in the year of 2001. however, there was an opposite trend in the change of the money spent on the necessary resources like books, which went up a little from 15% in 1981 to 20% in 1991, then undergone a dropping to 9%.
The spending of insurance in the school remained stably during the three years’ time, although it rise to 8% compared to the percentage of 1981(3%). However, the trend of the portion of salaries paid for other employees was opposite with that of insurance, which undergone a stable decrease from 28% to 9%.
In sum, the expenditure of hiring tutors took the biggest part of the total spending(almost 50%), which had experienced only a slight change. By contrast, the fee of insuring took up a minor portion,which was under 10%.
- The society is based on rules and laws The society would not function well if individuals were free to do whatever they want To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 73
- the tables below give information about sales of Fairtarde labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...an increase of 18% in the year of 2001. however, there was an opposite trend in the cha...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rises'?
Suggestion: rises
...ring the three years’ time, although it rise to 8% compared to the percentage of 198...
^^^^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
... fee of insuring took up a minor portion,which was under 10%.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64390243902 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63536557149 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556097560976 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5910609389 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161235999335 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718897565981 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753438649001 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940273058775 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644489785653 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.