The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The circular chart compare the total expenditure of five different amounts of UK schools in three years: 1981, 1991, and 2001. The data is calibrated in percentum. It is clearly and coherent representation.
To begin with, there was a one fourth percent of teachers salaries, and spent on insurance had been a tiny fraction. Moreover, the salaries of other employees was a more than quarter percent in 1981. Workers salaries had been declining in 2001, at a five percent to less than five percent . Furniture and equipment, and resources was same, in 1981 at less than five percent. (Respectively)
Secondly, the salaries of teachers were half percent at during the year 1991 and 45% in 2001. The changes in insurance was 3% in 1991, and 8% in 2001. Moving further, furniture and equipment was one in twenty percent in the time period of 1991, and than a quarter percent in period of 2001. The changes in salaries of other workers had been decreased at 22% to 15%, and resources were fallen at 20% to 9% .
Overall, it is evident that, the changes in spending was increased in the salaries of teachers at 5% to 10% during the given period, and the changes in spending, had been decreased the salaries of other workers at 6% to 7% in the year, 1981, and 2001.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies had been declining in 2001 at a five percent to less than five percent . Furn...
^^
Line 2, column 288, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... five percent to less than five percent . Furniture and equipment, and resources ...
^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: AND_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...percent in the time period of 1991, and than a quarter percent in period of 2001. Th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
..., and resources were fallen at 20% to 9% . Overall, it is evident that, the chang...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, secondly, so, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64864864865 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60712756845 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445945945946 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 0.482926829268 1657% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.958832044 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134611636802 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622974568553 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703926749563 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110032682063 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055011916564 0.0819641961636 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.