Three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1982, 1991 and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The graphs represent the differences in a UK school’s expenditures for each year 1981, 1991 and 2001. In general, the cost for teachers’ salaries is the main expenditure of this school which was spent from 1981 and 2001.
It is easy to recognize that the proportion of educators’ salaries increased slightly from 40% in 1981 to 45% in 2001. This figure in 1991, however, was significantly higher than in 1981 and 2001, that was 50% of the total school spending. On the other hand, the percentage of other labors’ pay was always lowers than the proportion of teacher’s salaries and there was a considerable declined in this proportion from 28% in 1991 and ended at only 15% in 2001. Finally, it is demonstrated in the graphs that there was a gradual rise in the cost for insurance of the school, the number of this was 2% in 1981 and 8% school spending in 2001.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-06-30 | FalexPingu | 61 | view |
- Evaluate a public place Suggest how it could be made more appealing It should be 500 words 10 in length 36
- The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 to 1996.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 67
- It is important to ensure that children with a wide range of abilities and from a variety of social backgrounds mix with each other at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- Evaluate a public place Suggest how it could be made more appealing 52
- Some people believe the benefits of tourism outweigh the problems it creates in particular place Discuss both views and give your own opinion 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 735.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77272727273 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04631284115 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512987012987 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 200.7 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.292609069 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118208826259 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768092489708 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350793943311 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109579573607 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184734062198 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.