Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think it is waste of valuable money.
What is your opinion?
Environmental issues have become more serious in recent years. There is a significant increasing of many types animals and plants which are threatened by human activities. Personally, I agree with the viewpoint that governments should fund more financial resources to conserve species threatened.
Plant and animal habitat is an important part of the Earth and in fact, it is need to be protected. We know that, plants have played as a crucial role in creating oxygen in keeping life. Plants and other species keep our Earth be balanced. For example, plants create oxygen for animal breathing and they are a sources of many types of alternative medicine. So, these things are crucial elements of our Earth, even for our existence. The changing of any part could have considerable influences to left parts. Thus, the protection of endangered species, even any other types of living things is necessary and very important.
Additionally, people are the major factor which harms natural habitat. As the consequences of logging, deforestation, and mining activities, there are many species are disappearing or they have confronted the extinction. Therefore, people has to take responsibilities with what they have done. And giving more money is a solution which can provide for many sectors, such as conservation plants and seeds or animal rescuing, to solve the prevalence of endangered species.
To sum up, people have confronted to many environmental problems because of many harmful activities of them. Living things are an rigid part of human living, so, governments and people should share their money to help recovery our Earth. That is a possible method which anyone can contribute and together to protect our planet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-31 | Manpritsingh | 80 | view |
| 2017-05-29 | FalexPingu | 91 | view |
- Evaluate a public place Suggest how it could be made more appealing 55
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support the received from employers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 56
- It is important to ensure that children with a wide range of abilities and from a variety of social backgrounds mix with each other at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 93
- Some people think a job not only provides income but also social life. Others think it is better to develop social life with people you do not work with. Discuss both view. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 308, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a source' or simply 'sources'?
Suggestion: a source; sources
...xygen for animal breathing and they are a sources of many types of alternative medicine. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the prevalence of endangered species. To sum up, people have confronted to man...
^^^
Line 4, column 128, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...l activities of them. Living things are an rigid part of human living, so, governm...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, in fact, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27272727273 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92927994424 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7784284084 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2941176471 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1764705882 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52941176471 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145922029694 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470724600733 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423583981706 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.092689921497 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219099387807 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.