The three pie charts below show the coffee production and consumption of coffee and where the profit goes around the world. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Production
South Africa 44%
Indonesia 22%
Japan 18%
Vietnam 16%
Consumption
Europe 41%
America 39%
Rest of the world 12%
Japan 8%
Where the profit goes
Delivery 51%
Retailers 24%
Producers 15%
Exporters 10%
The given three charts illustrate the data about the three different coffee sectors: Production, Consumption, and Distribution of profits, around the world.
Overall, South Africa and Europe are the key players in the coffee production and consumption markets, respectively. Despite the producers playing a crucial role in the coffee supply chain, they receive a small portion of the profits, with delivery services capturing the majority share.
In terms of production, South Africa is the most prominent producer, accounting for 44% of the total coffee production and Indonesia’s production is half of that. Japan and Vietnam contribute 18% and 16%, respectively.
When it comes to consumption, Europe is the leading consumer, representing 41% of global coffee intake, and America is a close second, consuming 39%. Japan needs to import only 8% of the coffee, as it is also a coffee producer. The rest of the world consumes just over a tenth of the coffee.
The pie profit distribution in the coffee market is illustrated in the third pie chart. Half of the total profit is earned by the delivery sector, whereas the retailers earn almost a quarter of the profits. A tenth of the profits go to the exporters and remaining 15% profits are earned by the production sector.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-27 | Zahid6400 | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-09 | Sajib Ahamed | 73 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the coffee production and consumption of coffee and where the profit goes around the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Production South Africa 4 73
- The graph below shows cinema attendance by age in Great Britain Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown 84
- The diagram below shows the process of getting a driving license Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 67
- The diagram below shows the process of getting a driving licence Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 56
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Units of electricity by fuel sourc 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19711538462 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89599917224 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1996373739 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2727272727 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289988760205 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103299674134 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797651663496 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149253956689 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359083643321 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.