The diagram below shows the process of getting a driving licence. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.
The given flow chart illustrates the process of obtaining a driving license.
Overall, acquiring a driving license involves three main tests: the eye test, the written test, and the driving test. Additionally, financial capability is required. The process is multistep and comprehensive.
The process begins with an individual visiting a license center and filling out an application form. After submitting the form, the person must take an eye test. Failing the eye test disqualifies the applicant from proceeding further, and the process ends there.
However, passing the eye test allows the person to pay the fee and take the written test. The fee covers three attempts at the written test. If the written test is passed, the applicant proceeds to the driving test. Before obtaining a license, the applicant must pass the driving test. If the applicant fails the driving test, they must pay an additional fee to retake it. At this stage, the written test is not retaken.
Finally, the individual obtains a driving license after successfully completing these steps, and the process concludes.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-07-26 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
2024-07-10 | Sajib Ahamed | 56 | view |
2024-07-10 | Sajib Ahamed | 67 | view |
2024-07-08 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
2024-06-30 | Zahid6400 | 78 | view |
- This is questio The graphs below show the different reasons of the groups of students to choose Dorrifod University Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Age 18 24 Age 25 and over Close 73
- Question The chart below shows the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant In 1985 Oil 52 Nuclea 78
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Units of electricity by fuel sourc 67
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Units of electricity by fuel sourc 67
- The charts below show the percentage of time working adults spent on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant In 1958 In 2008 W 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 33.7804878049 36% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29142857143 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72700179236 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491428571429 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.9212023492 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.1428571429 112.824112599 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.5 22.9334400587 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.71428571429 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0742136275636 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.035877882093 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316337464694 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0626701356082 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246960784279 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.51 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.