Question: The chart below shows the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
In 1985.
Oil 52%
Nuclear 22%
Natural gas 13%
Coal 8%
Hydrogen 4%
Other renewable 1%
In 2003.
Oil 39%
Nuclear 17%
Natural gas 23%
Coal 13%
Hydrogen 4%
Other renewable 4%
The pie charts illustrate the proportion of energy produced from various sources in a particular country between 1985 and 2003.
Overall, oil was the predominant energy source in both years, although its dominance declined over time, as did nuclear energy. Conversely, all other sources, except hydrogen, saw an increase in their contribution.
In 1985, the three main energy sources were oil, nuclear, and natural gas, accounting for 52%, 22%, and 13% of the total energy production, respectively. By 2003, oil’s share had decreased significantly to just under two-fifths (39%), while nuclear energy saw a notable reduction to 17%. Natural gas, on the other hand, experienced a substantial increase of 10 percentage points, reaching 23%, thereby overtaking nuclear as the second largest energy source.
The remaining energy sources collectively represented around one-fifth of the total in 1985. Coal and other renewables displayed an upward trend, with coal rising from 8% to 13% and other renewables increasing from 1% to 4%. Hydrogen, however, remained constant at 4%. Among the smaller sources, coal had the most significant increase, and other renewables grew to become the fifth largest energy source in 2003.
- Question The chart below shows the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant In 1985 Oil 52 Nuclea 78
- The charts below show the percentage of time working adults spent on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant In 1958 In 2008 W 89
- The three pie charts below show the coffee production and consumption of coffee and where the profit goes around the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Production South Africa 4 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Units of electricity by fuel sourc 67
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Units of electricity by fuel sourc 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, second, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53191489362 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84030599796 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648936170213 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0348398027 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233377387248 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986986902986 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110285773288 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172771166981 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124557813034 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, second, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53191489362 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84030599796 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648936170213 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0348398027 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233377387248 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986986902986 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110285773288 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172771166981 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124557813034 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.