The three pie charts below show the total spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001.
The three given pie charts compare a specific school in the UK in terms of how it allocated its budgets over a period of 20 years from 1981 to 2001.
It is evident from the charts that most of the money was spared for Teachers’ salaries. Additionally, an oscillating trend was recorded in all categories, except for the figures of Other workers’ salaries and Insurance.
In 1981, the school expensed a majority of its budgets for Teachers’ remunerations, with 40%, which outnumbered the share of Other workers’ salaries by approximately two to one, at 28%. At the same time, the rates of Resources and Furniture and equipment accounted for a comparable figure, at 15% of the total, compared to 2% of the money allotted to Insurance.
To 1991, the proportion of Teachers’ salaries increased marginally to 50%, at which point it started to undergo a minimal drop to 45% in 2001. Meanwhile, the figure for other workers’ remunerations dipped slowly to 22% and 15% in 1991 and 2001 respectively, compared to a fluctuation witnessed in that of Furniture and equipment to 23% in 2001. By contrast, whereas the percentage of Resources grew insignificantly to 20% in 1991, then plummeted to 9% in 2001, this school was inclined to spend more money on Insurance, with 3% and 8% of its budgets in 1991 and 2001 in turn.
- The diagrams illustrate 3 different types of bridges 73
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 84
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 73
- The map below show the information about the change of Riverage college 30 years ago and now 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87168141593 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0663333714 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535398230088 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.6306302499 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.625 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235476464214 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980105466563 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867116750968 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142761337289 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102531512712 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87168141593 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0663333714 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535398230088 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.6306302499 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.625 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235476464214 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980105466563 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867116750968 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142761337289 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102531512712 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.