Time schoolchildren (10-11 years old) spend on different home activities
The graph shows spended time by children aged 10-11 on two activities:computer and TV.
In general, watching TV hours have decreased remarkably. Moreover, the figures for computers saw a gradual increase.
According to the graph, from beginning the period till 2003 spending time on TV remain stable at 20-22 hours per week. After that the numbers start to decrease till 2004 and then showed considerable fluctuation. And the numbers have stayed constant till end of the period.
Looking at the another details, we can see that spended time on computer activities by 10-11 year aged children saw significant growth at the given period. In comparision with another given years the figures showed greater upward trend between 2001 and 2004. Till end of the period weekly hours spended on the activities have increased from four to 22
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-15 | EELLeeee | 78 | view |
| 2020-05-19 | vaguely | view | |
| 2020-05-19 | vaguely | view | |
| 2019-11-25 | Sanatbek Sobirov | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | AlisherBabajonov | 63 | view |
- Time schoolchildren 10 11 years old spend on different home activities 63
- The chart below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008 56
- Time schoolchildren 10 11 years old spend on different home activities 46
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 67
- Time schoolchildren (10-11 years old) spend on different home activities 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e till 2004 and then showed considerable fluctuation. And the numbers have stayed...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, then, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 702.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 136.0 196.424390244 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16176470588 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.41495297035 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76234841604 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 194.4 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1580200418 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1111111111 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201525404854 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783587033486 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926147046663 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127801743407 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10399591976 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.