Tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton
The line graph below illustrates the information on visitors to England who went to four different tourist attractions in Brighton from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the percentage visiting the Pier and the Pavilion increased over the period, while the proportion of visitors who went to other places decreased.
In details, in 1980, the percentage of people who came to Pier just increased 10%. Despite some minor fluctuations, this figure jumped from about 12% in 2000 to 225 in 2010. The number of people went up quickly from about 22% in 1980 to nearly 50% in 1995, but there was a sudden decrease about over 30% in 2010.
As you can see from the line graph, the most popular Brighton attraction in 1980 for visitors to England was the Festival. Although 30% of these attended the Festival in 1980, by 2010 this percentage had fallen slightly to 28%. In 1980, the figure for visitors to the Art Gallery was 21%. It rose to a peak of 38%, but this then decreased dramatically to less than 10% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-16 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-27 | taoxanh99 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-09 | lalo | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | chipchip99 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below illustrates the information on vi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6408839779 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51356322002 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569060773481 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9152902624 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206969904927 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848139312287 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140006359405 0.0843802449381 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161828967655 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.16934765387 0.0819641961636 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.