The given column graphs illustrate the amount of money spent on food and other products in Norway, Poland and UK for a period of 1998 to 2000.
Overall, the Norway spent more money on food items, whereas the UK spent least on these items in the two given years. The polish spent the highest proportion of money on the other items in the given decade.
In terms of food, in 1998, people in the Norway spent 15% of their income to buy foodstuffs and the figures grew significantly to 45% in 2008. In Poland, 30% of income used by buyers in 2008 which was noticed 8% on food in 1998. Regarding UK, buyers spent only a 5% of income in 1998 and 25% in 2008.
The proportion of other items was higher in poland. Above 30% of amount spent by poland in 2008 which was increased to fourfold than the last decade. The other two countries Norway and UK spent 8% and 5% in 1998. Afterthat, the figures inclined to 20% and 28% in 2008 respectively.
- The two column charts below show the percentage of food and other items bought by three European countries in 1998 and 2008. 56
- The two column charts below show the percentage of food and other items bought by three European countries in 1998 and 2008. 56
- The line graph below show the population size ,birth and death rate of ENgland and Whales from 1700 to 2000. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 769.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.36931818182 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26264097091 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460227272727 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5157336468 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.9 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233835355722 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114058550674 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552268412033 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153673654916 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254924268278 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.77 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.