The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s.
The supplied pie charts enumerate the different sources of energy in the United States of America in two different decades- 1980 and 1990. The spectacular feature of the chart depicts that major source of energy in the USA is Oil.
As is observed from the provided information, the consumption of oil in 1980's was 42% which was lowered by 9% in the subsequent decade. However, usage of Natural gas was almost a quarter in the starting years and remained almost consistent in the following years.
Moving further, the production of energy from the hydroelectric power maintained a plateau in all the years whereas there was a 5% burgeon in the manufacture of the energy of coal from 22% to 27% in the given time period. It is fascinating to note that the energy derived from the Nuclear power in the stipulated time-period became twice of its previous value which was 5%.
All in all, the manipulation of Coal and Nuclear power has mounted as an energy source while coal is being avoided.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | Spring2019 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | tiendung00001 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Lia Bui | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Kamal1993 | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | green1222 | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five-year period. 84
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 78
- Money spent on exploration of space is a complete waste, it could be spend more effectively on improvements of living of people. To what extent do u agree disagree 79
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirementTo what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 78
- The graphs show enrolment in different colleges in the Higher Colleges of Technology in 1999. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
...ded information, the consumption of oil in 1980s was 42% which was lowered by 9% in the ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83139534884 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68734867259 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56976744186 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6172995374 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.714285714 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174155770012 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836444626403 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629046258672 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101502139139 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717096596092 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.