The given maps compare the renovations that have taken place in the town of Denham over a period of 34 years from 1986 to the present day.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the town has undergone numerous changes resulting in better infrastructure, improved facilities, and expanded layout. A drastic increase in the residential community has eradicated the agricultural sector completely. However, a small post office to the west of the driveway and a bridge over the river stoke remained unaltered.
The striking feature of the given illustration in 1986 is the dominance of farmland, which was spread out towards the east and west side of the driveway. After that to accommodate the increased population, the present era can witness a surge in the housing units at the extended roads through the driveway replacing the farmlands and the shops as well. Now there are neither shops nor farmlands left, although the post office is still there.
Moreover, to the east of the bridge, removal of the pathway connecting the river to the gardens has led to the expansion of the old primary school. In addition, the gardens, including the large house have been knocked down to create a spacious retirement home with few planted trees. The connecting edge of the extended roadside to the retirement home is surrounded by new residential units to the south of the primary school.
- The table below shows the percentage of the population who rode bicycles in one town by age group in 2012 96
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
- people now have the freedom to live and work anywhere in the world due to the development of communication and transport what are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 84
- Essay on the topic of oil usage by four major consumers along with future predictions in a line chart 78
- An essay featuring two graphs a pie chart and a bar chart related to students in Singapore from 2000 to 2010 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, moreover, so, still, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1239.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05714285714 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77156382105 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583673469388 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4964195948 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.9 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113905358354 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393061838228 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694382818186 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831481843443 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874256537757 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.