The two maps below show the developments along Olive Drive before and after the construction of new facilities between 1980 and 2010.
The maps compare the area around Olive Drive after the renovation bewteen 2008 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that there were several changes taking place on both sides of the road. After the remodeling work, the area become more residential and offered new businesses.
On the north side of the road, the house unit lined the park along the vehicle tracks was extended along the main road in 2010, making Olive Drive a more residential area. Another noticeable change was the construction of the school right near the denizen’s area, while the park maintained its position.
On the other side of the road, the original shops were reduced in size to pave the way for the erection of the supermarket, and the shopping centre located next to this new facility. The new coffee shop was erected on the place which used to be a bank, while the bank was moved to behind the community centre. The community centre and the hospital remained unchanged throughout the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-24 | Tôn Nguyễn Hồng Phúc | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-04 | vivitoben | 76 | view |
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994 according to United Nation statistics 84
- The charts give information about the volunteers by organization in 2008 and 2018 Summarizing the report by describing the main features with comparing data 89
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for the period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 86
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 78
- Some people think international car free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution others think there are some other ways Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oad, the house unit lined the park along the vehicle tracks was extended along th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83233532934 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39290308108 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616766467066 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.634550283 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.875 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.625 5.23603664747 12% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161844090076 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693566131105 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771156465202 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113639375162 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780675890391 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.