The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The first map illustrates the original island before the development of tourist facilities, and the second map highlights the notable changes took place in this island.
We can see that this island just including a beach and some trees that no other facilities and people before developing. However, after developing by tourist company which include many buildings that attract people to travel.
On the left, near the beach, it is a new swimming place developed in it but there is no facility in before. Also, we can see some accommodations are built near the trees and sea and with footpath for visitor to go swimming. In the central region of the island, a new restaurant and reception through the vehicle track connected which near the accommodations.
On the right of the island, we just see some accommodations in it and the right seemingly is not develop which looks like the same. Moreover, there are some ships on the sea which located in the island’s inferior. And a pier built for tourist to travel the sea and go to the island conveniently.
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Celebrities receive constant attention from the media Some people believe that the media should not publish stories about a celebrity s private life To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- As global trade increases many goods even some daily goods are exported to another country which includes long distance transport during shipping Do you think its benefits outweigh its drawbacks Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant exampl 89
- The chart below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 67
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'developed'.
Suggestion: developed
...ns in it and the right seemingly is not develop which looks like the same. Moreover, th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, look, moreover, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87845303867 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78672192983 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53591160221 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.4053557103 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.1111111111 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166807647532 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737955451556 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425466906379 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112965868281 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416017607752 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.