The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Given is the map illustrating the changing patterns of an island followed by the tourist state-of-the-art facilities added.
It is clear from the map that the island underwent perceptible alterations, which comprises of accommodation, restaurant, reception and pier. In addition, there are also footpath and vehicle track systems helping tourists in terms of going back and forth.
According to the previous state of the island, there was only the appearance of natural plants and beach which was in the west of the island. However, the beach is currently used for swimming and trees which are in the west of the area surrounded by accommodations. In the center of the site, there was a construction of a new reception and a restaurant which was built to the north of the island.
The island is covered by the sea, so compared to a millennial year ago, the pier appeared. Remarkably, visitors nowadays are served for travelling to the sites by means of erecting footpath and vehicle track.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-06-22 | Mishika sugandhi | 78 | view |
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the frog. 60
- The best way to increase employees' job satisfaction is to increase their salaries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Financial education should be a mandatory component of the school program. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...nderwent perceptible alterations, which comprises of accommodation, restaurant, reception an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06666666667 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03209643901 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 15.5478093312 43.030603864 36% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.5 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158932929328 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665237298651 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574876597226 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0998611190303 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584564688852 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.