the two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

These maps illustrates the road access toward City Hospital in two different years, in 2007 and 2010.

In general, changes are made related to the construction of Roundabouts, Bus Station and New Car Park. In detail, there are two Roundabouts built in 2010. The first one was constructed the intersection of City Road and Hospital Road, while the second one was built in three-way-intersection of Ring Road and Hospital Road. Previously, in 2007, there was no roundabout found in the road toward City Hospital.

There used to be several Bus Stops in Hospital Road in 2007. But, three years later, in 2010, those Bus Stops are removed and replaced by the establishment of new Bus Station. The new Bus Station is located in the southwestern side of the map. Furthermore, there is also segregation of Car Park which was located in the southeastern side of the map. Previously, in 2007, the Car Park was used for both staff and public. But in 2010, there is new Car Park built in the northeastern side of the map, that is used for public. Meanwhile, the old car park is used for staff.

In conclusion, there are vast development of road access to get to a City Hospital. Changes are made through the replacement of old facilities and construction of new facilities.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
These maps illustrates the road access toward City Hospital in...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, while, in conclusion, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80365296804 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01229384722 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447488584475 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9415246432 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.1428571429 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6428571429 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212544188777 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870064587523 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871105709405 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173096445604 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100580265016 0.0819641961636 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.