There is a debate whether money should be spent for building new rapid train railway lines or bettering current public transportation. I completely agree with the latter view and will explain the reasons.
On the one side, using money on constructing rapid train railway lines is good because it can support more rapid trains to operate. Since rapid train can operate in rapid speed and has special railway, it can help reducing traffic jam. Thus, the more rapid train railway lines that are available, the less traffic jam will occur. However, due to its high fare, people will most likely to be reluctant to switch from their private vehicles to rapid train. Consequently, traffic jam can not be overcome by the existence of more rapid trains.
On the one side, spending money on bettering current public transportation is great because it will make them to be safer and more comfortable. This will encourage people to transport using public transportation instead of using their private transportation. Moreover, because of its affordable fare, people will most likely to be willing to switch from their private transportation to public transportation. As a result, the existence of public transportation will help reducing traffic congestion that occur in the country.
In conclusion, using money on constructing rapid train railway lines is good because it will support more rapid trains to operate, which can help reducing traffic congestion problem. However, it has expensive fare which make people reluctant to ride them. Meanwhile, public transportation has more affordable fares which will make people willing to ride them, and therefore will reducing traffic congestion that occur in the country. Therefore I completely agree that it is better to spend money on bettering public transportation.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 73
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. 61
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 61
- Some people argue that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others believe that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to reduce' or 'reduce'.
Suggestion: to reduce; reduce
...ed and has special railway, it can help reducing traffic jam. Thus, the more rapid train...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 472, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to reduce' or 'reduce'.
Suggestion: to reduce; reduce
...ence of public transportation will help reducing traffic congestion that occur in the co...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to reduce' or 'reduce'.
Suggestion: to reduce; reduce
...rapid trains to operate, which can help reducing traffic congestion problem. However, it...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 380, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'reduce'
Suggestion: reduce
...illing to ride them, and therefore will reducing traffic congestion that occur in the co...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 435, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...c congestion that occur in the country. Therefore I completely agree that it is better to...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34615384615 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90678911424 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 176.041082164 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.416083916084 0.561755894193 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2529697922 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.933333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20871156055 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093309106607 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616982245477 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15865626901 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298089946476 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.